As most SEO copywriters know, to maximize the impact of web content it’s important to expertly craft a title, perhaps as carefully as the content itself. The content title is typically used as both the page <title> and the main page heading (<h1> or <h2>), both of which heavily influence search engines rankings (EDIT, 21 June 2010: latest research suggests <h1> is actually not that important). The relevance and attractiveness of title also influences whether or not a searcher will click-through an individual search result on a results page.
Check your web content titles against the following list to maximize impact:
- Use relevant site target SEO keywords. Your website content strategy should have included an exercise to identify the search keywords and phrases that you want to target. These are the words that will match potential customers’ searches to your business offerings. For example, we have a list of generic target key phrases (content strategists, content strategy), together with target key phrases for individual pages that offer our services (website content analysis, SEO content optimization, web content writing services). Your titles should ideally include one or two of these target key phrases.
- Check other key phrases with Google Keywords Tool. For non-target key phrases – other important words or phrases in the title that aren’t on your ‘hit list’ – run them through the Google Keyword Tool to see if an alternative phrase or synonym might attract a higher search volume and/or have lower competition. For example, I recently recommended that a blog title slightly change the phrase ‘test case management software’ to ‘test case management tool’, because the new phrase attracts nearly twice as many searches, against similar competition.
- Prioritize important keywords. If possible, re-phrase your title so that the important keywords appear near the start of the title. This blog post could have started, “6 simple steps for…”, but these words are not the target keywords, therefore they were de-prioritized in their positioning.
- Check attractiveness. You can be as scientific as you want with keyword analysis, but eventually you need your potential reader to find the title interesting enough to click through. Rather than just stuffing your title with key phrases, make sure you include phrasing to attract the click-through (in this case: ’6 simple steps’ – people like lists!).
- Check relevance to content. With the most compelling, keyword-targeted title in the world, if your content doesn’t match the expectation of the title, your reputation will suffer – and with modern social media, reputation is key to the viral success of new content. Bottom line: don’t dupe people (“Free Nude Celebrity Photos!” should not click through to a blog post about car insurance).
- Check length (under 64-66 characters). The number of title characters that a search engine will display on a results page differs from engine to engine, and over time. As a rule of thumb, you typically don’t want a total title length greater than 64 to 66 characters (and if your CMS or blog engine appends your blog/site name to the title, take this into account).
And in case you were wondering, the original draft title of this post was: “How to craft great titles for your web content“.



Frankie Roberto
1 year ago
I think I prefer your first draft title.
Here’s why:
* ‘How to’ is a great opener – clearly describes the nature of the article (it’s a guide), and makes it clear that it’s offering practical help.
* ‘craft’ is a nice friendly touch, and makes it feel less functional than ‘copywriting’.
* Lists are over-done, and ‘steps’ implies a sequential process, rather than a number of stand-alone tips..
* ‘Optimization’ is a nothing-word, and only has relevance to SEO types, not content authors (fine if you’re targeting those).
* ‘Titles for your web content’ is more generic than ‘blog title’, and applies to a wider range of content (this could be a good thing or a bad thing, depending on your audience).
Here’s my quick suggestion, based on your original title:
“How to craft effective titles for your web pages”
Frankie
Dan
1 year ago
Thanks for the great feedback, Frankie.
I agree that the original (and your) title is less of a ‘cliche’, and might make a better title for a well-established business with an existing readership – it’s certainly more readable, which is always a good thing.
Even so, the ‘optimized’ title
is better for us right now. We’re already starting to see growing Google referrals in our Analytics which, for a site launched less than a week ago without any assigned PageRank, is pretty astonishing. Here’s why:
* Your suggestion doesn’t contain any of our target keywords and contains high-competition (‘web pages’) low-volume (‘effective titles’) phrases – remember there’s a big difference between small differences (web pages, web page, webpage, website, web content, content, blog, blog title, blog titles) in the SEO world, in the three important factors: intent, competition and volume. If I check for ‘effective titles’ in the UK, Google tells me there’s ‘not enough data’ in the monthly search volume (i.e. 10 searches or less, a month)
* “How to” is a low intent phrase for us, but has the highest priority in your title: people searching for ‘how to’ typically (not always, but typically) are people looking for information to ‘do it themselves’, rather than a commercial service. This audience isn’t high on our target list right now (although, of course, that’s always a great segment for getting re-blogged and some incoming links, so we’d never write it off – hence including the ’6 steps’, but in a lower priority).
Like I said: I think your title (and the original) might work for an established site that’s just looking to attract traffic, but it adds little value in terms of incoming anchor text or intent-based searches – our two biggest SEO factors to concentrate on right now.
Dan
Frankie Roberto
1 year ago
Hi Dan,
Thanks for your additional comments.
I guess I was thinking more about creating titles that people would want to click-through to (eg from a search results page, or in a feed reader) than actually matching terms that people would search for in the first place (which is, I suppose, what SEO is all about).
It does make my heart sink to see clear, understandable titles turned into keyword-stuffed phrases though, I have to admit.
Not to mention the US-English spelling of ‘optimisation’…
Ben Myers
1 year ago
I think a checklist like this would probably cost at least $2,000 through a consultant — strangely, I’ve seen a well-written blog on a particular topic with committed writers produce better SEO results without any checklists.
In the end, it’s better to have great content and good writers than any list of tricks and tools. That’s my two cents.
(I’m still going to use this list)
Thanks!
Lee Hughes
1 year ago
Seems to have worked for you because you got tweeted by KISS metrics in which I found your site and i’m now currently re-writing all my posts
Love the length and direct nature of this post.
David Knapp
1 year ago
I am using a WP plugin called Copy Compass for better SEO. I just found it yesterday so I don’t have any results yet.
Have you heard of this plugin and if so do you think it will help write better blog titles?
Oliver Gehrmann
1 year ago
The picture in the header is very cool – if you understand it.
Really liked the article, too. Like Lee pointed out already, the length and direct nature are awesome!
- Oliver
Jackie
1 year ago
Hi Amy and Dan,
Silly question – is this true of all content titles, or specifically blog ones? We’re looking for the best way to rename our pages at work and I’m wondering if this is good practice across the board (I suspect yes, but just wanted to be sure). Thanks!
Dan
1 year ago
Hi Jackie,
Yes, on the whole, these rules can be applied successfully to generic content too. However, because your main pages will be used less as “link bait” (i.e. they are informational, rather than just marketing-influenced copy), you’ll want to tone down (very slightly) how much you tweak them for SEO. It’s good practice to put the most specific information first (e.g. “Page Name | Company Name”, rather than “Company Name | Page Name”), and you should still try to get some target keywords into your important landing pages / section pages, where they make sense to the user. But I would avoid swapping out words that the user understands for ‘higher volume’ alternative phrases that are more obtuse, just for the sake of SEO.
Dan